The initial idea was to write about medieval knights and the way how their “clumsy” suit of armor works. I will definitely talk more on this topic in future articles.
One of the reasons why this article finally appeared — is personal bias towards old times. In my childhood, the look of ancient warriors was always connected with something epic.
I bought plastic soldiers and reconstruct unknown battles, watched different films like “Dragonheart” which was good fantasy movie with talking dragon played by Sean Connery. I would read different novels about knights and browsed for hours German encyclopedias dedicated to armor and weapons and played video games created by Bioware, Bethesda, Firefly and other talented teams. As you see more than enough reasons to look closer at the development of armor.
When I started preparations I realized how different was from reality the armor production and usage of it compared to a common appearance in media.
For a big part of an audience, equipment of soldiers in the movie remains no more than just a decoration that helps to recognize a time period.
However, we shouldn’t blame main characters for going on battles with uncovered head, because it’s important for a film director to help viewers to identify main heroes in a screenplay.
In the same time, we as designers feel that there is more to explore than just an aesthetic side.We’d like to have deeper knowledge about the subject to understand what kind of design tasks armorers solved with their creations.
When I dug deeper into the subject I got completely lost, in the number of facts and details that exist behind these pieces of leather and metal.
People who constructed armor were great designers. They worked on a protection keeping in mind physical strength of a person, war conditions, weapons of an expected enemy and make them not only functional but even elegant.
One of such examples is the Maximilian armor which has a lot of fluting to provide extensive protection for soldier. Also, it reflects the fashion style of its age with lots of cloth layers in a garment.
In this beautiful painting made by Sir John Everett Millais, we can observe Joan of Arc wearing full plate armor.
What is interesting about this painting, even counting the number of details described, it’s not historically accurate. Joan of Arc lived and fought in the middle of the fifteenth century. While Maximilian armor was invented about sixty years later after her death.
The armor was so solid that could protect a knight from arquebus shots.
When we look at the variety of armors it’s hard to figure out how exactly these pieces of chain and plates functioned. Reasons and facts standing behind design decisions remain unclear.
Historical reenactors spend years on studying old manuscripts to understand how it worked and get a more precise context of its usage.
The main point — the design for military purposes must be efficient.
Any kind of miscalculation may have a severe impact like wounds or death of a human. Here we can remind the importance of appropriate UI design in aircraft cockpit when design decision without deliberate testing would become a disaster for hundreds of people.
The essential part for an understanding of the way how armor works are conditions and environment.
Military equipment of modern soldier can weigh up to twenty-five kilograms while the suit of armor of the fifteenth century wasn’t heavier. Each of them created to protect a soldier, while particular age and weapons dictated different goals for manufacturers to solve.
The first masters of armor design appeared a long time ago. So we will track the conditions and specifics of different time periods to understand the context.
Methods of war were changing as tactics and technologies of manufacturing armor and weapons got more and more advanced.
We begin our journey from ancient Greece. Not only did Greek civilization bring the ideal of beauty to the whole world, and the greatest philosophers, mathematicians, sculptors. But because of endless civil strife and conflicts with neighbors, they had to defend themselves. To survive people of Greece invented their own ways to protect their land.
Hoplite, Hoplon, and Hellenes
The history of Greece is a vast topic and we will focus our attention on one particular period — from 500 — 450 years b.c.
To give you a background of equipment of soldiers we will discuss separate parts of armor, and how it was produced.
It’s curious though that Greek people never named Greek themselves. It was an insulting name given by Etruscan people due to the sound of Greek speech for their ears. Greeks called themselves Hellenes.
Greece in that period wasn’t one big country with the centralized government. Instead, there were scattered cities across islands called polices. It means that each police had its own code of laws, government, and money.
When we talk about Greek society of that age we need to consider that there were no people who spent entire life on training and preparation for battles, except Sparta. It was indeed, a military camp in a size of a city.
One distinct city-state even prosperous simply couldn’t afford to spend money on supplying a regular army. People who earned enough bought the armor for their own money. Its also the explanation of a different look of armors depending on city where it come from.
There were a lot of conflicts different in a size and impact. To see more clearly the ingenuity of Greek commanders we will consider First Persian invasion and one of the crucial battles among Greece and Persian empire — “Battle of Marathon”.
If we look closer at the map, and resources available for Persian army compare to Greece it gets harder to figure out how this small scattered on islands country resisted in front of huge, organized empire. The borders of empire exceeded five million square kilometers. While Greece occupied circa one hundred and eighty thousand square kilometers.
Athenians were alone with approximately ten thousand men standing in front of empire’s army with cavalry, archers, swordsmen and one hundred thousand of oarsmen remaining in reserve.
The whole Athenian army was represented by one type of soldier — hoplite. It was heavily armed infantry armed with spear, and small sword xiphos as a last chance weapon.
Their panoply consisted of:
— closed heavy helmet, that protected almost the whole face of a soldier;
— muscled cuirass made of bronze or lighter material;
— big wooden shield strengthened by bronze sheet , 90 cm in diameter, called Aspis;
— the protection of thighs and greaves to protect legs.
The first thing that might come to our mind after looking at their armor — is this helmet was so convenient? Certainly not, it was frequently used by artists in their creations, but for warriors, it wasn’t the best option.
As an every armor piece, it has gone through number of improvements. The earlier version of this helmet was heavier and significantly restricted the vision of a soldier on a battlefield. The positive side was a better protection of a face.
Its name helmet got from the name of the police where it was first discovered — Corinth. Originally Corinthian helmet was produced from a single piece of bronze. Later it will consist of several parts.
Concerning the weight of a helmet, I’ve found evidence of two and half kilograms and even five. Probably it was parade helmet. Moreover, it’s hard to name precise weight because original helmets are partially destroyed by corrosion. What is interesting about this helmet is older versions of it were created without holes for ears. The hearing of orders from the commander was muffled for soldiers.
In later versions, we see that helmet acquired holes for ears and then it will widen the space around eyes. Because clear view of on a battlefield is more important than anything else.
As the further development of this idea, Greeks invented more opened types of helmets.
One of the examples of evolution is Chalcidian helmet.
These helmets also were made of bronze. Due to making them more open, the weight was reduced to around one kilogram. We don’t observe any restriction for eyes, nose defense became shorter. Appeared additional protection for a neck. The protection on the both sides of the face with cheek plates.
Phrygian helmet is another direction of evolvement for Corinthian helmet.
We observe that the view is even better than in Calchidian helmet. By compromising face protection near eyes, the cheek pieces were extended to protect the lower part of face. We can imagine that look of such warriors intimidated the enemy. As for the strange popping crest we have two points to consider. First — the shape of the skull is curved that makes the directed blow weaker that makes weapon slide down. The second point — the shape echoes the cap of Attis Phrygian god of vegetation.
Moving to shields now. The main technological achievement of shields is the way how a soldier can hold them.
The shield is the most important piece of armor and the heaviest one, five to seven kilograms. Due to their curved shape and chain around the perimeter of the shield, it can be carried on a shoulder. While most of shields had only one handle in the center of the construction. In Aspis the inner part has the strap in the center and grip near the edge. This design allowed hoplite hold it more tightly, thus the formation could sustain better in front of attack of enemies and keep the order in ranks.
The shields were decorated with vibrant pictures. Since each city was an independent player on a map, some people asked artists to paint a shield with a coat of arms of their family or the symbol of the police.
And finally the cuirass. The popular statement that bronze cuirasses were heavy isn’t that solid as it seems to be. The cuirass was solid enough to protect soldier and thin enough to fight and cover long distances. It was true masterpiece of blacksmith, and no wonder that it costed a fortune to order one.
While it’s highly possible that hoplites who faced Persians wore the lighter version of cuirass, the more common appearance is one wearing armor made of bronze.
The popularity of bronze was dictated by the technology level. While 1085 degrees is melting temperature of copper. Most of weapons and armor were produced by pouring melted bronze into specific forms.
Instead of bronze cuirass, hoplites could also wear linothorax. It was made out of many layers of linen or leather glued together.
Since lighter type of cuirass was produced from organic material there is no samples survived till nowadays. We left only to discuss hypothesis of how good it worked for them. Counting the point that it was lighter, more flexible and didn’t heat as much as piece of bronze we can state that hoplites benefit from using it.
Wearing bronze armor and armed with spears Greek people were ready for battle. Persians were so confident in their victory that brought marble on their ships for building the monument to immortalize their triumph.
And a little spoiler — they were a bit too confident, counting what happened after.
Next time we will talk more about who was the enemy and what kind of armor they had compare to Greek warriors.
If you like this article please let me know about it, and don’t forget to share it with others.
I also invite you to read our review of “Getting real”, great book written by guys who created Basecamp and another article of design in real world, and also our own list of reasons why hackathons are great.
Kudos to Sasha, Anya, Andrey who helped to make this article better.
Source of Pictures :
Source of materials:
knyght errant channel
schola gladiatoria channel
History TV channel